AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Azul jre12/7/2023 ![]() Signed jar with only META-INF/* inside is not verifiable Various classes of sunec.jar are duplicated in rt.jar Remove dependency on EC classes from pkcs11 provider (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020fĭisable weak named curves by default in TLS, CertPath, and Signed JAR (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2021a The following table describes the OpenJDK changes implemented in this release. This vulnerability applies to Java deployments that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. It can also be exploited by supplying untrusted data to APIs in the specified Component. Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: Node (Node.js) It is listed here for comparison with other Java implementations which may contain this CVE. Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: Node (OpenSSL)ĬVE-2021-3450 This CVE is not applicable to Azul Zulu Builds of OpenJDK. ![]() * The Azul Zulu builds for CentOS 8 are discontinued on Decemdue to Red Hat terminating CentOS development and shifting focus to CentOS Stream.ĬVE-2021-23841 This CVE is not applicable to Azul Zulu Builds of OpenJDK. Bundles with both C1 and C2 compilers were tested on ARMv7 hardware. Bundles with the C1 compiler were tested on ARMv6 and ARMv7 hardware. Bundles with both C1 and C2 compilers were tested on ARMv7/ARMv8 hardware.Ģ. Bundles with the C1 compiler were tested on ARMv6/ARMv7/ARMv8 hardware. Linux (PowerPC 32-bit Hard-float and SPE)ġ. This section provides information about the operating systems that are supported in this update release of Azul Zulu. * Azul provides three types of distribution packages for each Java version: The following table lists detailed information on the Azul Zulu versions released with the current update. This release is a quarterly update release for Azul Zulu Builds of OpenJDK version 16, 15, 13, 11, 8, 7, and 6. Coordinated Restore at Checkpoint (CRaC).Azul Zulu 16.30 for macOS (Apple Silicon).Azul Zulu 16.30 for Musl-based Linux on Arm64.Azul Zulu Builds of OpenJDK Release Notes.We still need to do the build and package steps (Windows/macOS only, 10(?) jobs, ~2 minutes each, if I had to guess - both are failing due to signing certificate issues). ![]() This is where most of the time is anyway (20-30 minute test runs, although there might be a way to reduce it to 10 minutes or so). We still need to do the tests on every platform + java combination (15 jobs, 3 platforms * 5 java versions). And compiling on multiple platforms lets us ensure that the occasional contributor can still build on a platform the core developers don't use. If we were to compile the class files for that version (I should fix that). We could technically build the jar on one platform and reuse it on the others, but building with multiple java versions will let us know if we use something illegal in a newer version of java. We really just need to have one build step per platform + build steps for multiple java versions on a single platform (15 -> 10 jobs). We could do some changes so that we only generate the packages after the build and test steps complete, but that would take a little bit of time and experimentation. By comparison, a higher tier linux runner is. And we do a build with almost every commit (every push, which usually comes out to every commit). I don't have the numbers for how long a build would take on an M1 Mac, but figure ~1 hour for the build, which comes out to $9.60/build. Once arm macs are available for building on with a standard ("free to us") size runner, I think we'll be able to turn it on.Īs of writing, the per-minute rate for the m1 mac is $0.16. For more information, see "About billing for GitHub Actions." These runners will always be charged for, including in public repos. Note: Included minutes cannot be used for larger runners. The lead maintainers may have a different opinion on that. I don't know what the pricing scheme is going to be after the beta period ends, and I don't want to have to temporarily disable a build platform while we figure out whether or not the pricing scheme will work for us.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |